|
Funding increase for independent/private/catholic schools
|
|
|
|
Guest_Telmatiaeos_*
|
20/08/2012, 11:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Our kids are in private, and even I don't agree with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2012, 11:56 AM
|
  
Posts: 1,412
Joined: 22-April 09
|
|
Advanced Member
|
QUOTE (JRA @ 20/08/2012, 11:47 AM)  WOW http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-20/gill...schools/4209166the govt hasn't responded to the Gonski report, but has announced that all schools will have funding based on the same model, therefore all private/independent/schools will get a funding increase I am in shock Me too and disappointed that this has been announced. Knowing some very wealthy private schools, it sucks IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2012, 12:05 PM
|
   
Posts: 5,195
Joined: 7-May 09
From: sydney
|
|
+
|
QUOTE So I don't see how this can automatically equate to more money for independent schools It's because they are not following the Gonski recommendations as this would result in a decrease in funding to some very wealthy private schools. I'm in shock too - I think that the private/public school divide is very dangerous. A thriving public school system that takes away the need for private education is what makes equal opportunity a reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2012, 12:08 PM
|
  
Posts: 1,924
Joined: 2-January 08
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
perhaps it comes down to percentages? ie public schools already receive x percent funding and private y where y is significantly less than x?
So then if you give an extra 5% funding per child to all schools, it may be an added 50% funding for a public school but an additional 100% for a private school which did not get much funding before.
It shows that without enough information we really cannot comment properly.
"Gonski recommends that the Federal government fund using a school resource standard. All schools would receive a base amount of funding per student, with additional money for educational obstacles such as socio-economic disadvantage, remoteness, non-English speaking background and indigeneity. This would be applied to all schools in all sectors – public, private, and Catholic. The neediest schools would receive the greatest public funding. Schools serving disabled students would be fully funded."
This sounds like a good solution, I hope that is what the gillard govt meant.
2handsdon'tspillit - our public school is in a low socio economic area, where it is apparent that parents don't value either attendance nor education.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
-
You could win a copy of Parental Guidance on Blu-ray and DVD and tickets to Madame Tussauds Sydney.
-
You could win one of 20 Call the Midwife Series 2 DVD prize packs.
-
Win the UE Boombox to listen to music wherever you go, or a TV Cam HD to Skype loved ones right from your TV!
-
For your chance to win a $100 Coles/Myer voucher each month, share your recipe on Essential Kids.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Featured Promotions
Advertisement
|