Navigation

Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )


7 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic

> Delayed introduction of solids is now bad.

V
Excentrique
post 15/12/2012, 10:16 AM
Post #1
****   Posts: 1,590   Joined: 19-May 11     
Advanced Member
Just read this article: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting...v-1226537159388

They are saying that delayed introduction of solids is not helping to prevent anaphylaxis, so they are about to change the recommendation for introduction of solids.

'But many now suspect that delayed weaning, a lack of vitamin D from sunlight and hyper-cleanliness could be to blame, through overstimulating children's allergic reaction to certain foods.
The National Health and Medical Research Council will soon release new guidelines for infant feeding, which will relax its current recommendation that babies be exclusively breastfed for six months.'

'Dr Mullins said the longstanding advice to avoid risky foods like peanut and egg until children are older had not prevented allergies.'

'The NHMRC's existing limit of six months mirrors that of the World Health Organisation, but clashes with advice from Australia's top allergy specialists.'


Thoughts?

This post has been edited by Excentrique: 15/12/2012, 12:45 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Giltine
post 15/12/2012, 10:22 AM
Post #2
***   Posts: 642   Joined: 27-June 10     
Regular Member
It's all so confusing I'm surprised that anyone knows what to do any more. I've had three different doctors tell me three different things when it comes to DD. I have allergies to some very common foods, and one said start her on them from 4 months, one said 6 months, and one said 12 months! So I really have no idea.

And by the looks of it, the people who write these recommendations have no idea either!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
qak
post 15/12/2012, 10:42 AM
Post #3
****   Posts: 3,626   Joined: 19-September 06     
Advanced Member
It sounds more and more like there is no one single link.

Certainly the number of kids with allergies is frightening these days. When I went to school allergies were pretty rare, there was a bit of asthma around. There was certainly not ever any rules about bringing any type of food to school.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Excentrique
post 15/12/2012, 10:59 AM
Post #4
****   Posts: 1,590   Joined: 19-May 11     
Advanced Member
Personally I do wonder if it has something to do with sterile living. The body doesn't have so many pathogens to fight, so it attacks the food instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lucretia Borgia
post 15/12/2012, 11:06 AM
Post #5
****   Posts: 3,150   Joined: 20-August 11     
Advanced Member
QUOTE (Excentrique @ 15/12/2012, 11:59 AM) *
Personally I do wonder if it has something to do with sterile living. The body doesn't have so many pathogens to fight, so it attacks the food instead.

Of all the theories floating around this is the one that interests me the most, and seems to have the most merit (from my completely unscientific background of course!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackbird
post 15/12/2012, 11:12 AM
Post #6
***   Posts: 874   Joined: 20-May 05     
Regular Member
Maybe our food is just crappier than it has ever been before.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
caitiri
post 15/12/2012, 11:24 AM
Post #7
****   Posts: 1,042   Joined: 31-May 08     
Advanced Member
I have heard one theory (of unknown scientific validity) that its more about the way food is produced then anything else for example the varieties of food that are the easiest to grow are also more allergen producing.

Could be utter nonsense I have no idea
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Betty_D
post 15/12/2012, 11:30 AM
Post #8
**   Posts: 261   Joined: 27-November 10     
Regular member
It is so confusing. With our DS, we couldn't decide whether to go for 4 or 6 months, so we went bang in the middle and started at 5. The decision was easier to make as by that point he had started to show an interest in what we were eating.

Parents are just trying to do what's best for their children and these conflicting reports make it just that much harder. I also dislike the insinuation that these allergies are either caused or prevented by a parent's decision as to when to introduce solids.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smoo
post 15/12/2012, 11:38 AM
Post #9
**   Posts: 199   Joined: 17-January 10     
Member
They ignored the follow up to that report after they found the correlation they actually found- kids with asthma and allergies wean later BECAUSE of the asthma/allergies not the other way around... I can't find that study now, will keep looking - of course that part of the study got no publicity at all

It's all contradictory anyway I started solids before 6 month because DS was interested in them, I am a big believer in go with what works for the child on this since I really don't think the doctors have a clue on this one
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MakeLoveNotBacon
post 15/12/2012, 11:41 AM
Post #10
******   Posts: 12,767   Joined: 10-October 09   From: land of no sleep  
++
QUOTE
The National Health and Medical Research Council will soon release new guidelines for infant feeding, which will relax its current recommendation that babies be exclusively breastfed for six months.
The new draft guidelines state that weaning should commence at "around six months of age", giving parents more leeway to introduce solids at four or five months.
The NHMRC's existing limit of six months mirrors that of the World Health Organisation, but clashes with advice from Australia's top allergy specialists.



What an outrageously irresponsible and confusing report.

There is NO WAY NHMRC would recommend weaning (as in stopping breast milk) at 6 months which is how the article is worded.

From my readings, the NHMRC are NOT changing their guidelines. They recently reviewed the research and the guidelines will remain "around 6 mths" for the introduction of solids. That does not translate to four or five months as stated in the article.

Let's not forget The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy have sponsors from Baby food companies. Call me a cynic. http://www.allergy.org.au/about-ascia/sponsors

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

 
 
Advertisement
 
 
Advertisement
 
 
 
Featured Promotions
 
 
Advertisement
 
 
RSS Lo-Fi Version
Skin by IPB Customize
Time is now: 26/05/2013

 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.