|
Swimming lessons policy, Discriminatory against working parents?
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2013, 02:42 PM
|
  
Posts: 4,485
Joined: 5-March 08
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Hi
I'd like to enrol my 4.5 yo in swimming lessons. She is not yet in school, she is born in August so will start prep next year.
There is one local pool, pretty well run, which runs 1/2 hourly lessons Mon-Fri 8-11am or so and in the afternoons 3-5pm. In other words, alot of lessons during the day at alot of different times.
I've put in a enrolment form requesting any day Mon-Fri, any time after 4pm. Reason being we both work and this would fit in with work/daycare commitments.
They've called and advised ALL afternoon places are for school age children only. In other words, children born in the same year as my daughter but because she is born in August she is not yet in school. It's not her age (4.5 yo) that is the issue, its that she is not in school. Even if there are places available, my daughter cannot join any afternoon lesson.
The only lesson offered is 8.30am Saturday - no prizes for guessing why there's so many empty places in that class - or the morning lessons Mon - Fri when of course we are at work.
WDYT? Fair enough policy, or discriminatory against households where two parents work? What the policy means is that working parents of pre-school aged children can only attend weekend lessons (or take time off work Mon-Fri to attend morning lessons).
IMO its fair enough that school age children are prioritised for those afternoon lessons as they definitely cannot attend morning lessons. But if places are free then surely putting a child born in the same year as prep children but not yet in prep won't make the sky fall down?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2013, 02:56 PM
|

Posts: 373
Joined: 6-February 10
|
|
Member
|
|
I think it's fair enough. Keep the rule simple. What would happen if they gave it to you then a whole heap of other parents wanted the space and there were no places left for new school enrolments. There has to be a cut off somewhere. Also, maybe it has to do with organisation. There are 20 or so primary school children with 1 teacher so they (usually) can follow instructions and have a certain level of maturity. Not all 4.5 year old child can. This is a complete generalisation (I'm a primary school teacher so I'm aware of inconsistencies!) but I think it's easier for them to say 'only school children' rather than 'we'll take 4.5 year olds if there are spaces but you'll have to leave if a school kid wants the place and none are available and your child must be able to follow instructions to a certain level'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
-
You could win a copy of Parental Guidance on Blu-ray and DVD and tickets to Madame Tussauds Sydney.
-
You could win one of 20 Call the Midwife Series 2 DVD prize packs.
-
Win the UE Boombox to listen to music wherever you go, or a TV Cam HD to Skype loved ones right from your TV!
-
For your chance to win a $100 Coles/Myer voucher each month, share your recipe on Essential Kids.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Featured Promotions
Advertisement
|